Last month it
emerged that Starbucks had paid nothing in UK corporation tax over
the previous year, despite making sales worth £398 million here –
that's about $597 million. There are other companies here which I
don't have to name, but I'm sure you know, who haven't paid their
full share of tax either. This is because they have their
headquarters in another part of the almighty Common Market, known to
the rest of the world as The European Community, where the rate of
Corporation Tax is lower than here.
Places like
Ireland and Luxembourg.
I know big
companies do the same in America; credit card companies tend to be
based in Delaware and Starbucks themselves are based in Seattle,
Washington; that's Washington State, for my pals over here who don't
know, and not the capital Washingon DC.
There are
other companies, corporations or just firms who don't pay sales tax
in America but collect it and don't give it to the government. They
do this because the local government want them in their vicinity
because they create jobs which means they pay wages into the
community and the people that receive the wages spend in that
community and so stimulate the economy.
What usually
happens in America is the local government will give the new company
a free ride for ten years to give them a chance to build up the
business then hope they will start to pay taxes after the ten year
period is up and not move away.
Well that is
in America and this is Britain; this is another country, unlike
America who have different tax laws and rates in different states. In
fact they have different laws and, would you believe, I don't think
murder is a federal offence and neither is a hate crime. If they were
federal offences they would all have the same punishment – such as
the death penalty. You will know which states still carry out the
death penalty – they're the ones with the most murders!! So where's
your argument about a deterrent now??
In Britain,
plans are afoot this week to occupy Starbucks coffee shops throughout
the high streets of the land.
The idea
is that because Starbucks do not pay corporation tax – or very
little - they are causing some of the cuts to the economy; the
campaign is being led by an activist group called 'UK
Uncut' whose activist Sarah Greene said: “It is an outrage that the
Government continues to let multinationals like Starbucks dodge
millions in tax while vital services like refuges and rape crisis
centres face the axe. It does not have to be this way.
"The Government could
easily bring in billions that could fund vital services by clamping
down on tax dodging, but are instead making cuts that are forcing
women to choose between motherhood and work, and trapping them in
abusive relationships.”
The UK Uncut group plan to
fill the Starbucks shops with women and their children as crèche
facilities have been withdrawn through cuts, the homeless, as
shelters have been closed due to the cuts and women in need of help
who are in battered relationships.
Crèche facilities are
usually supervised services and so are the others; are they going to
provide the personnel?
This is all because of the
cuts the Chancellor of the Exchequer and The Prime Minister have
introduced because of the recession/depression and here is a photo of
the Prime Minister taken yesterday -
as you can see he is really
tightening his belt!!
Whoops!!
Maybe
he needs to tighten more than his belt!!
Let me just say that
Starbucks is one of the few places here where you can buy proper
filter coffee!! They sell the dreaded Americano too but at least I
don't have to drink it!!
I didn't know starbucks got away with stuff like that too.
ReplyDeleteLets not forget Coca Cola too......they do the same thing all over Europe.
ReplyDelete