Wednesday, August 8, 2012

London: Riots to Olympics.

There are a lot of people who read this blog; I am amazed by the amount of countries it goes to – well it goes to every country, of course, but I'm amazed by the amount of countries where people read it.
For some reason, within minutes of it being published the post is read in Iowa by somebody; I know the IP address and the city and I would love to hear from them - in fact I can see where every post is read.
I never know by whom, of course; I have two counters and the one where I have all the details has the blog receiving about 40,000 hits since I started and the one which comes with the package has it nearer 50,000 hits.
This is nothing compared with Matt Drudge's blog, of course, but the post I wrote about Julian Assange has had over 5,000 hits and still attracts them even though I wrote it in December 2010.
I would like to tell all those people that no matter what you may hear or read elsewhere, London is really the place to be at the moment. There were a lot of naysayers about The Olympic Games but they are here, they are successful and they are making a lot of people happy.
It's such a friendly place to be with Britons believing they could be winners at last.
This time last year, on August 8th in London, my daughter and her boy friend/partner/esposo were out having dinner and celebrating his birthday. His name is Chris too; no not Chris 2, Chris too – so happy birthday Chris.
As they sat there the London riots, which had broken out on August 6th, arrived at the leafy suburb of Ealing where they were eating. My daughter was four months pregnant at the time so they cut their evening short and managed to get home safely.
Nearby a 68 year old man, well known to the locals of Ealing, tried to stamp some of the fires out and was killed by one of the participants of the so called riot. I know the perpetrator probably didn't mean to kill him but the exponential affect of a growing mob when it gets out of control can lead to anything.
Four cars were set on fire, shops and buildings in a street nearby were smashed and set on fire too. These shops were small businesses; some set up by young people who had raised the money for a deposit and borrowed the rest. There were about 150 rioters, so they say, and they also looted a branch of Tesco's for alcohol and cash. I remember seeing them on TV smashing a bookies' window.
15 of them jumped on to a bus, forced the driver out and crashed it.
We were in Edinburgh at the time and the young people of that city didn't riot at all; there was too much to do with the festival and things.
Some people from other countries, likened the riots here to the Arab Spring. It's sad when people don't know the history of the place and give wrong opinions. Two years after the Conservatives were elected last time there were riots in Toxteth, Liverpool. Police had a bad reputation there with their treatment of blacks and the sus law; the sus law allowed police to pull in anybody for questioning if they 'looked' suspicious. It was bound to happen just as it happened in Tottenham last year and spread to other boroughs and other inner cities.
Last year's riots were started after the police shot someone – I'm not going to comment on that but if you want to read more just put Tottenham Riots on Google.
But there were other young people last year who were doing something else. The rioters last year were a minority of the younger generation – to use an old phrase – but there were thousands of others who were getting ready for this year – the Olympic Games.
The Olympic Games were always criticised by somebody – I remember years ago asking someone if they'd seen so and so and they said they didn't like the Olympics as they were all supposed to be amateur. Well that was okay for rich posh boys and girls who could afford to take time off to train or if you were from a country in the Communist Block who fed their athletes performance enhancing drugs and gave them time off to train.
Isn't it good to see that since there is now a real crack down on drugs and more sophisticated equipment is available to detect the cheats, that the Russians and Germans don't seem to be winning much.
And I know about the IOC and the old men who run it and take advantage of the youth the games are meant for, but those corrupt old men send people to take part in sport and not to get killed in wars.
The Opening Ceremony was wonderful and the crowds attending the games are supporting the athletes. The British are as partisan as the rest of the world, for a change, but support the rest of the world's athletes too; especially Usain Bolt; the 100 metres final was watched by one third of the total population.
The final of the 100 metres almost coincided with the 50th Anniversary of Jamaica's Independence and plenty of Jamaican Celebrations took place in the capital.
London won the Olympics on July 6th 2005; people celebrated it was a great day. The place was on such a high. People were actually dancing in the streets and the next day the bombers attacked.
Whether it had anything to do with the Olympic announcement I don't know. They had planned the attacks and made their pathetic videos well beforehand; got themselves out of bed that morning and could probably see the happiness and the celebrations taking place and still placed their bombs killing 52 innocent people.
Seven years later the Olympics are up and running and are successful and they are great!
And then there was Morrisey.
He says 'I am unable to watch the Olympics due to the blustering jingoism that drenches the event' and he criticises the U.K. public for the outpouring of support which has been seen since the Olympics kicked off.
The former 'Smiths' singer has cited a spirit of 1939 Germany in Britain this summer. A headline on the Internet says 'Former Smiths singer Morrissey has caused controversy by citing a “spirit of 1939 Germany” in Britain this summer.'
I hate jingoism and I agree with Samuel Johnson when he said that patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel but these people are cheering their team on; they appreciate good sport and applaud the other teams too.
I know it takes people's minds off the troubles of the world and kind of brainwashes them (us) but people need to feel good at the moment with politicians seemingly not knowing what they are doing and the bankers steaming forward into their new world order with their single currency ambitions and the worship of greed, but Britons are, for the first time, believing they are winners and maybe this will inspire youth to go to sport instead of rioting – who knows?
Morrisey lives in Los Angeles so he should know a little bit about jingoism and patriotism and in a business where he is almost worshiped by acolytes I think it sounds a bit rich.
Poor old Morrisey.

4 comments:

  1. Poor old Morrissey? "Poor old" because you don't agree with him? Much less poor and, ideologically, MUCH less old than you, I'm afraid, my friend. I agree it may not be Germany 1939 bit neither is it hunky dory as the picture you'd have us see, Chris.

    http://www.democracynow.org/2012/7/31/goodwill_image_belied_by_arrests_censorship

    ReplyDelete
  2. A bit more commentary:

    "Farcical and dystopian acts like the arrest of six people for spilling custard during street theatre often prompt observations that events like the Olympics present a "state of exception" – where standard rights are derogated in order to facilitate a spectacle. But the Italian theorist Giorgio Agamben, who is best known for discussing the issue, should not be misunderstood. This is a state of exception, but far from being a period outside the norm where standard rights do not apply, it presents a chance for a lack of rights to be properly inaugurated into the law once the exception, the Olympics, is over."

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/jul/30/olympic-protests-heavy-handed-policing

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. First of all I thank you for your comments and I am flattered that you commented twice. I think 'poor old Morrissey' not because I disagree with him, or that he is poorer or younger than me, but because he is the one who is missing out.
      He is the naysayer – the party pooper. He sees a lot of people happy and has to try and spoil the fun. It's good publicity for him as he has that tour of the USA coming up where he will have the same kind of adulation he sees at the Olympic Games and he will be protected by the same type of goons that we have all seen at pop concerts.
      Not at the Olympics, I might add; they have the army. They are not the Palace Guard or any of the so called elite you hear about from the armies in the Middle East, they are friendly squaddies who are helping out after the Group 4 debacle who couldn't even recruit workers in a climate of unemployment.
      Morrissey is missing the anticipation and the thrill of seeing someone like Usain Bolt run; a magnificent athlete and a great role model for young kids of today. They will never forget him just as I will never forget Roger Bannister breaking the four minute mile barrier.
      The two articles you point out have nothing to do with what I wrote in this post; I am not an avid supporter of the police when they arrest people for what seems trivial and as an actor I don't like them arresting actors in the street but you mention – well the article does – that this is a state of exception, just as the boat race was earlier this year when some idiot swam between the two boats in a protest against elitism. What did he hope to prove?
      When 'the state of exception' goes away the extra rules, regulations and security will go away too; this is not Syria or even the United States.
      When the Olympics are finished the Olympic Stadium will be taken over by a football team – maybe West Ham or Tottenham Hotspur; the Veladrome will stay and so will one more venue which escapes me for the moment. The rest are portable and will go to another event maybe even the next Olympics.
      The Olympic Village will be turned into affordable and social housing and private housing too; they don't want local people who make a success of something moving away from the area when they can afford something better which is usually the case.
      You are pointing out the negative side to the Olympics and I am looking at the positive. The games were awarded to London when Ken Livingstone was Mayor (Red Ken as the papers called him); he promised diversity for the locals with job and business opportunities building and improving East London – it was full of scrap yards at the time; scrap yards and, to use Giorgio Agamben's word in the article, was in a state of distopia – but when the Mayor was changed (by an election)to Boris Johnson the diversity kind of went out of the window. I'll write about Boris next week – stay tuned.
      With regards to the 182 cyclists being arrested (in The Guardian article) - my understanding is that there had been an order to stay away from the area whilst the opening ceremony was taking place. This is natural – you have seen this on Hollywood Boulevard when there is a film premiere or the Academy Awards. And what were the cyclists doing there on their £1500 bikes wearing their 'all in one' ensembles? They had to choose that time, the time of the opening ceremony to want to cross some bridge after they were told not to. A few weeks ago cyclists were protesting that they wanted to use the Olympic Lanes – the lanes that are reserved to get competitors to the games on time, the fast lanes; this is what the cyclists wanted to use; come on give me a break.
      A walk in the Olympic Park would do you the world of good, Jeffo; there's so much positive feedback you wouldn't believe.

      Delete
  3. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete