Hi folks: first
of all this is the last review for you to peruse. Now the question
is, not to be or not to be, but the reason I put the reviews
up warts and all in the first place.
A lot of friends,
some who invested in the crowd funding, wanted to see them and I
thought it a good way to show them off as they're not bad. Nobody
going mad over them but you can see they are, more or less, the same.
But what would
happen if they were really terrible? Well the first thing would be I
wouldn't give the reviewer free tickets to anything else – that's if there
ever is anything else but would I show them off?
Peter O'Toole had
the worst notices ever when he did a tour of Macbeth – awful they
were so he made the theatre post them outside for everybody to see;
used them in advertising and let everybody know. And the result: a
huge hit; it was hard to get a ticket the whole things was a huge
success; even went to Broadway.
Another play, a
musical this time, was slated by the critics; another worst notices
ever situation. The director called the Box Office to see how bad the
ticket sales were on the second day, as he was going to make
arrangements to close the show.
He was told by
the box office that the queues were around the block; they had sold
out many months ahead. The show: Le Miserables. Twenty odd
years later it is still running.
When I first went
to Edinburgh with my Irish Show I had a problem with my guitar just
as the first night was about to open: I lost my capo and had to use
one which would not hold the strings down. The reviewer said I would
make a fortune as I would appeal to the old and middle aged but that
it was the worst guitar playing he had heard.
I saw him before
the notice came out, at a party, and he said he loved the show and
thought it would go far – then I saw the worst guitar
notice. And guess what I did: I told the theatre to put the worst
guitar notice at the front of the theatre; and the result? You
guessed; nobody came – I wasn't Peter O'Toole.
Also the fact
that my family show was booked in to the 11.30 PM slot.
Needless to say I didn't end up there at any of the other Edinburgh
visits and they only charged me one week's theatre rent.
That show I had
stop every night whilst the cannons fired at the tattoo which was
taking place in Edinburgh Castle close by.
My favourite
review for Eddie was the first; the first one I posted on here: she seemed to have it down to a tee; she
spotted the Irish bits and called my final song Joycian which, to a
James Joyce fan, is the highest piece of praise to have – even
though the song wasn't by the Genius Jim.
So here is the
final review. It won't make any difference to my play. I have
received an enquiry about taking the play to America; if that works
out I will take it to Santa Monica Playhouse too and then . . . who
knows? Let's see if I have to raise any money for it and a lot of
other bits and pieces and odds and sods and stress and mayhem – who
knows?
This is from AYoungerTheatre.com
This is from AYoungerTheatre.com
Review: The Two Sides of Eddie Ramone, Jermyn Street Theatre
The
Two Sides of Eddie Ramone, is as the title might suggest, a play
built on conflict and tension. We see the titular character (played
by Chris Sullivan), a formerly popular comedian now consigned to the
cruise ship circuit, switch between his interior and exterior facing
selves. And, alongside the play’s only other character, his
daughter Katie (Shian Denovan), the piece sets up a fraught
mirroring of recollections and intentions. Notwithstanding some
flaws, the show is a thoughtful look how we build our realities and
sense of self.
The
subject matter is fiercely interior. The action opens on Eddie
rattling through his tired stage performance when he suddenly finds
he is having an out of body experience. This capitulates him inside
his own head, where he starts to ruminate on his career and family
relationships and builds a stylised life story constructed through
his curated memories. It is striking that, even during his deepest
ruminations, he is still performing to the audience, never quite able
to let go of his on stage persona.
Later
in the play his daughter joins him and adds her own clashing counter
narrative, gradually unpicking the version of events that Eddie has
built up in the first act. It is a deft manoeuvre from Sullivan, who
also wrote and directed the show, and leaves the audience revising
their interpretation to the very end. However some aspects feel a tad
convenient and the narrative, trying to pack too much in, verges
close to being implausible. The strong performances from Sullivan and
Denovan, though, are able to paper over any cracks in the premise’s
believability.
Eddie
is of Irish descent and the work’s concerns are, too, staunchly in
the Irish dramatic tradition. Catholicism, guilt, abuse, alcoholism
and fear death are all writ large. The vision and thematic reach are
grand in their scope, but there are some aspects of the execution
which mean it falls short of its ambition. As the work unfolds
entirely as a recollection, its main means of storytelling is
through anecdote. These sometimes meander and run away with
themselves and you catch yourself wondering what the point of all
this exposition is, as it often adds little to the narrative thrust.
Despite
a few unanswered questions, The Two Sides of Eddie Ramone’s
chief interest is in its thoughtful character studies by the two
performers. If you can overlook a few bizarre moments, it’s worth a
look for their evocation of a troubled father-daughter relationship
and the new light shed on it when it is remembered and retold.
The
Two Sides of Eddie Ramone is
playing Jermyn Street Theatre until 30 July. For more
information and tickets, see the
Jermyn Street Theatre website.
Mmmmm I refrained from commenting after the first published review. Mainly because I am a committed fan of yours, but did not want to bore others with Repetition! What does come through with all reviews is that there were two very talented actors on stage, giving their all. As far as I am concerned the 2 Sides of Eddie Ramone should run and run, even licensed to parts of the globe where civilisation and J Joyce have yet to maintain a foothold!
ReplyDeleteI was told a long time ago there are some so called critics who write as their belly guides them! Shame some seem to have been attracted