So
what happened to Tony Blair? I read somewhere that
the powers that be – the courts – are looking for a way to try
him for going to war with Iraq as the lawyer
for a former Iraqi general argues that the former PM should face
trial due to legal precedent set during Nuremberg hearings –
Nuremberg hearings? Where they tried the top Nazis – Hermann
Göring,
Rudolf Hess and the rest of them. Would you put Tony Blair in that
company?
When
I left this country to make my way in Los Angeles around August 1994
he was the bees' knees. On his way up with his super duper new Labour
Party, the leader of the opposition and the scourge of the then Prime
Minister, John Major. He had been a follower – a close follower -
of the Labour leader John Smith and when Smith died of a heart attack
Blair took over.
Rather
like the time when Hugh (I will fight fight and fight again for
the party that I love) Gaitskill died leaving the way open for
Harold Wilson. When it was Wilson's Labour Party it was a different
kettle of fish. No sooner had he taken over the party, won an
election in 1964, when there was a big out-flux of investment money
from Britain to anywhere else.
At
one time, because of that, no one was allowed to take more than £50
out of the country when they went abroad. That's how bad it was.
Then
the Chairman of the Mirror Group, Cecil King organized a coup
– yes a real coup. They met in an office in Fleet Street – I
remember it was a privileged place which was allowed to use a coal
fire in a smokeless zone. King organised
the coup and what they were going to do and . .. it didn't come off,
of course. Among those at the meeting was the Chairman of the Bank of
England, Sir Basil Smallpiece (aptly named), Lord Mountbatten and
Tony Benn. You can judge a leader by the team he picks; Tony Benn
leaked it to The Guardian and saved the day.
They
didn't trust Labour then, so you can imagine the shenanigans if
Jeremy Corbyn is ever Prime Minister.
With
Blair, Labour did what Bill Clinton did in America by ruling from the
centre – only they did it from the center as our computer spell
checks keep reminding us.
He
was the main actor behind the Northern Ireland Peace Process and,
whilst it has not achieved everything, he is responsible, partly, for
peace in that place.
Tony
Blair was a million miles from Wilson and made a pact with Gordon
Brown, over dinner in a London Restaurant, to decide which one of
them was going to be the Premier.
As
I mentioned before, you can judge a leader by the team he picks –
also it tells a lot about a man if you look at what he eats. The
restaurant was chosen by Blair and Brown didn't like the bill o' fare
– he wanted steak and chips and Blair was an early cordon bleu
aficionado possibly preferring houmus and
bean sprouts.
The
two agreed to have Blair as PM with Brown to take over after spending
time as the Chancellor of the Exchequer – the money man. It might
be said that he was the best Chancellor of the Exchequer of the
century. Blair was the suit and Brown was the brains.
When
Blair handed over to the reins of the party (and the PM) to Gordon
(he gave away our gold) Brown, a very decent talented man, he
had to succumb to the jibes of the nameless ignoramus who regularly
introduced the BBC programme Top Gear
for a while who, whilst being interviewed on Australian TV, said that
Britain was being governed by a one eyed Scotsman – yes a
nameless idiot. (Brown lost an eye playing rugby).
That
one eyed Scotsman virtually saved Britain's bacon during the world
2008 financial crisis.
Since
coming back to live in London, I have realised
that a lot of people hate Tony Blair and blame the invasion of Iraq
on to him and only him. How could this happen? One man cannot go to
war without a vote in Parliament.
We
lived in America during the Iraqi war; Blair never even came in to
the equation on the news and neither did Ahmed Chalabi.
He
was one of the main characters in the invasion of Iraq, one of the
main characters in that terrible war which killed many civilians; one
of the reasons they went to war was Chalibi and for Chalabi's
ambition. And there he is above.
Ahmed
Chalabi was an exile living in the United States when George H W Bush
issued statements saying the best thing to happen would be the
elimination of Saddam Hussein; the Iraqi rebels saw this as
encouragement with promises of help but the Americans abandoned the
Iraqis and left Saddam to murder any rebels that tried.
So
between the Gulf War and the Iraqi invasion Saddam Huissan ruled the
roost in Iraq with his policies of mass murder, telling all he had
nuclear weapons and was about to use them. The people of Iraq and the
world were looking for another leader, a Gandhi, a Mandela, a man of
charisma and they came up with Ahmed Chalabi – a man who had
embezzled money from a Jordanian Bank, a man who was exiled from Iraq
and a man who wanted to be the Prime Minister, President or leader of
Iraq – in fact all three.
He
had the information that Saddam did, indeed, possess Weapons of
Mass Destruction – WMD – (I won't put WMDs as it should be
WsMD and that can't be right).
The
information went from Chalabi to the secret powers, the spies, spooks
or whatever, and this got back to the CIA.
Inspectors
were sent to Iraq; Saddam had moved the weapons.
More inspectors:
Saddam was still pounding his chest, pretending to have what he
didn't. The inspectors couldn't be sure and I'm not even going to go
in to the fact that there was a mysterious death of one of them but .
. . .
You
can look all this up if you want to but when Colin Powell made the
statement to the UN, stating that they had received reliable
information, through the British, that Saddam had WMD he made that
man – the man with him in the picture –
stand
behind him. He was the leader of the CIA and that is where Powell got
the information and the CIA, through the British, which was assured
by embezzler Ahmed Chalabi that it was true. “Saddam was dangerous
and needed removing.”
Chalabi
assured the west that the weapons were dangerous, Saddam had
purchased some kind of barrel, I seem to remember, and other stuff
for his weapons.
At
the time the vice-president, Dick Cheney, was facing impeachment
threats. His company was going to be used during the war by supplying
equipment as with the Eisenhower warning of the Industrial
Military Complex and he with Bush, Rumsfeld and the other cronies
decided to invade Iraq.
Tony
Blair came along and gave them credence – they were going to do it
anyway, with or without Blair; with or without Chalabi – who wanted
to be Iraqi leader don't forget – and there is a time when you
don't know when to go to war or not. I am not a pacifist but I don't
ever want war because of that, I am against it but a few years ago there was
another vote in parliament here and the Labour Party were successful
in stopping the then Prime Minister David Cameron from going to war and the
reason they voted against – which is what the result was – was
the reaction and flack from the Iraqi war - which shouldn't be a
reason.